Key Points
- Families whose loved ones died in the infection scandal at Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH), Glasgow have told SNP Government “we won’t go away” in light of government proposals to abolish local health boards.
- First Minister John Swinney unveiled sweeping changes in which all the mainland health boards would be reduced to only two health boards as a measure to cut public sector costs and remove duplications.
- Families affected met with Health Secretary, Angela Constance to press for action rather than dialogue as the proposed dissolution of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC) could hamper corporate homicide inquiry.
- Jackie Baillie, Acting Leader of Scottish Labour demanded that Scottish Ministers give a legally binding assurance transferring any criminal liability to the successor bodies.
- The Scottish Government officials have claimed that the restructuring exercise would not affect the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry and the on-going investigation by Police Scotland.
Glasgow (Glasgow Express) September 9, 2026 — Campaigning families who lost loved ones due to fatal hospital-acquired infections at Scotland’s largest medical campus have issued a direct warning to the SNP-led Scottish Government, declaring “we won’t go away” amidst proposed plans to dissolve the responsible health board. As reported by Chris McCall, Deputy Political Editor of the Daily Record, nine bereaved families met with the newly appointed Health Secretary, Angela Constance, to express severe anxieties regarding First Minister John Swinney’s wide-ranging public sector reforms. The families contend that restructuring NHS Scotland by merging regional bodies will make achieving accountability for past systemic failures significantly harder.
The controversy follows First Minister John Swinney’s announcement during his Programme for Government statement, in which he unveiled plans to trim mainland Scotland’s regional health boards down to just two super-boards—one covering the East and one covering the West. Under these structural adjustments, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC), which manages the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH), would cease to exist in its current form and merge into a broader western regional authority.
As reported by Chris McCall of the Daily Record, Louise Slorance—whose husband Andrew Slorance, a senior Scottish Government official, died aged 49 at the hospital in 2020 after acquiring an undisclosed Aspergillus fungal infection during stem cell treatment—voiced the collective frustration of the campaigners. Speaking on behalf of the families who attended the ministerial summit, Louise Slorance noted that while Angela Constance claimed to have listened to their experiences, six successive health ministers have offered similar assurances over nine years without bringing resolution. Louise Slorance stated:
“We don’t need more listening, we need action now”.
As reported by Chris McCall of the Daily Record, a joint statement released by lawyers representing the campaign group directly challenged the timing and intent of the administrative reorganization:
“We believe that this proposed health board reform is an attempt by the Scottish Government to muddy the water over the QEUH scandal and we are now deeply concerned about the future prospects of the corporate homicide investigation”.
What legal protections are politicians demanding to protect the criminal investigation?
Political opponents have stepped in to press ministers for legal guarantees regarding accountability. As reported by Glasgow Live, Scottish Labour acting leader Jackie Baillie called on SNP ministers to enact explicit legislative safeguards ensuring that any corporate criminal liability linked to NHS GGC is seamlessly transferred to whichever successor body absorbs the Glasgow health board.
Jackie Baillie emphasised that for years families have been “kept in the dark, lied to, and gaslit” while searching for answers regarding fatalities at the flagship hospital campus. She noted that while streamlining bureaucracy remains a valid goal, the merger must not compromise the integrity of evidence or insulate decision-makers from prosecution. Jackie Baillie stated:
“We cannot afford to run the risk that this wide-scale merging of health boards leads to the loss of potentially valuable evidence. That is why SNP ministers must give a legal guarantee that any criminal liabilities are carried over to any GGC successor organisation”.
In response to growing public and political outcry, official representatives have maintained that organizational overhauls will not impede legal or investigative processes. As reported by The Herald, a Scottish Government spokesperson stated:
“Ministers established the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry to ensure families get the truth they deserve, and we are clear that changes to NHS structures will not impact on this. Our planned reforms to NHS structures are designed to improve NHS accountability, transparency and experiences for patients”.
The spokesperson added that ministers stand ready to implement all recommendations from the independent inquiry chair, Lord Brodie, upon publication of the final report, while reiterating that criminal investigations remain strictly a matter for Police Scotland.
Explore More Local Glasgow News
Glasgow Councillors Urged to Tackle Violence Against Women in Glasgow 2026
Glasgow Pub Named Scotland’s Most Dog-Friendly Venue in Battlefield 2026
What is the background to the QEUH infection scandal and the proposed NHS board merger?
The Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, a flagship £842 million facility opened in Glasgow in 2015, has been the focal point of years of intense scrutiny following severe waterborne and ventilation-related infection outbreaks affecting vulnerable patients, particularly in pediatric and adult oncology wards. Multiple deaths have been linked to environmental contaminants at the site, including that of 10-year-old cancer patient Milly Main, who contracted a bacterial infection tied to the hospital’s water supply in 2017.
Prior testimony at the statutory Scottish Hospitals Inquiry revealed long-standing vulnerabilities in the facility’s build and design. As reported by The Herald, senior medical staff, including Dr Michael Bradnam, testified that concerns regarding faulty ventilation systems were raised repeatedly over a 15-year period without formal resolution from board management. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde subsequently issued an unreserved apology to affected families, acknowledging that a causal connection likely existed between environmental factors and patient infections, while admitting “in retrospect” that the hospital opened prematurely.
The scandal escalated to a formal legal matter when Police Scotland designated NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde as a corporate suspect in an ongoing investigation into potential corporate homicide. Simultaneously, First Minister John Swinney unveiled an unprecedented restructuring plan to reduce Scotland’s mainland health boards from 11 down to 2 regional authorities in an effort to streamline public service delivery and address projected public finance deficits. The confluence of the impending public inquiry final report and the prospective dissolution of NHS GGC has created severe apprehension among campaigners that institutional liability could be diluted or lost across corporate transitions.
How will this development affect patients, health workers, and the bereaved families?
The implementation of First Minister John Swinney’s public service reform plan holds major implications across several key stakeholder groups in Scotland:
- Bereaved Families and Campaigners: For the families seeking justice for lost relatives, the dissolution of NHS GGC risks introducing procedural friction, jurisdictional confusion, and potential delays into ongoing police proceedings. If criminal liabilities are not explicitly assigned to successor authorities by statute, corporate homicide charges could encounter legal hurdles regarding which legal entity bears historical responsibility.
- NHS Patients in the West of Scotland: For the general public reliant on clinical services across Glasgow and the surrounding regions, the transition to a unified Western Health Board promises to reduce administrative duplication, streamline patient pathways, and equalize access to specialist care. However, patient advocacy groups warn that large centralized health structures risk losing local responsiveness to patient safety complaints, mirroring the administrative opacity criticized during the QEUH crisis.
- Healthcare Staff and Trade Unions: Frontline medical professionals and support personnel face organizational ambiguity. Trade unions, including Unite and the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), have warned that condensing health boards could trigger significant back-office restructuring, potential job losses, and operational disruption during an already challenging period for service delivery.
